This shows the night was really interesting because the day was the very day when ISHADOH (Id) and Mn also saw Ascraeus Mons as treated in CMO #201 Mars Sketch (3).
So we here list up some data of all drawings made by Id, Nj and Mn on 27 March 1997:
Code LCM Seeing Remark
Mn-440D LCM=044degsW moderate to good 10:40GMT
Nj-162D LCM=049degsW 8-9/10
Mn-441D LCM=054degsW moderate / good (*)
Id-099D LCM=056degsW 4/10
Nj-163D LCM=059degsW 7-8/10
Mn-442D LCM=064degsW moderate to poor
Nj-164D LCM=069degsW 6/10
Id-100D LCM=071degsW 6/10 (**)
Mn-443D LCM=074degsW poor / moderate
Nj-165D LCM=079degsW 6-7/10 (***)
Mn-444D LCM=083degsW poor / moderate
Nj-166D LCM=088degsW 7/10
Mn-445D LCM=093degsW poor / moderate
Nj-167D LCM=098degsW 5/10
Mn-446D LCM=103degsW moderate
Nj-168D LCM=108degsW 15:00GMT
Mn-447D LCM=115degsW poor / moderate 15:30GMT
Nj-169D LCM=120degsW
Mn-448D LCM=125degsW poor
Nj-170D LCM=130degsW
Mn-449D LCM=135degsW poor
Nj-169D LCM=130degsW 17:10GMT
where (*) corresponds to the drawing cited in #201 p2245, (**) does to the Id's drawing in #201 p2243, and (***) is the observation by Nj in question. We note Id-099D does not show any morning dark spot.
It may not be easy to identify Nj's spot (rightmost) with Olympus Mons. In the case of Id-100D, the characteristic shadowy area of Arsia Mons helped us to identify Ascraeus Mons. Nj-165D was obtained at the session not so far from Id-100D, and so Nj's spot might possibly be Ascraeus Mons.
As an explicit example which shows the morning Olympus Mons we can refer to an HST image taken on 30 Mar 1997 at LCM=094degsW as cited in CMO #191 p2102. The LCM implies a time difference of one hour from Nj's to compare.@ NAKAJIMA hesitated to write about these spots in his Observing Notes, but he remembers well that he saw several times the dark stains during his session: He was then uneasy about these because he wondered whether these were just noises or true signals. He wanted they were some blurred dark areas, but they remained like dark spots. He experienced these things for the first time and did not come to be well confident of their positions. The latter fact on the contrary rather suggests us that the spot at the right-hand side was most possibly Olympus Mons.
MINAMI (Mn) sat at the same eye-piece twenty minutes before (Mn-443D) and later (Mn-444D), but was not endowed with seeing enough to notice the stains. Thetime of drawing Mn-445D at LCM=094degsW was the most possible opportunity because it caught the shadowy area of Arsia Mons, but the seeing scale at that time proved poorer.
The case of Nj proves that if we are endowed with an improved seeing, we will be able to catch Tharsis Montes as well as Olympus Mons as they are deep inside even by use of a 20cm telescope if the apparent diameter is above 14 arcsecs. So it may be also possible to find the moment Montes will begin to be covered by the orographic clouds.
NAKAJIMA failed to see the stains again on the next occasion at Nj-166D, and he henceforward remained silent about this phenomenon.
N.B.: T NAKAJIMA (Nj) was born in 1939, and a Mars observer since 1954 (as Mn) at the Fukui City Observatory. In 1956 and 1973 he observed an early stage of the great dust storms. In 1990 /91, he obtained a total of 498 drawings which may be his record number for one apparition. In the preceding 1996/97 apparition he secured 282 drawings. He has been an acquaintance of MINAMI since Junior High. He is one of Editors of the CMO and a secretary of the OAA Mars Section. He teaches English in a High School at Fukui.